BioBooksAwardsComing NextContactBlogFun StuffHome

Quickies

I read my first short romance story today–one publisher calls them Quickies and another calls them Bites–and the one I read was around 40 pages or so. I’m not sure how I feel about it, TBH.

I liked the story and the hero and heroine, and the writing was good. And that’s where my problem came in–I wanted more. Forty pages just wasn’t enough. I wanted to see the story completely unfold between the hero and heroine. I wanted to know why they made the choices they made. I wanted to spend more time with them. It was so frustrating to be enjoying everything and have it come to an abrupt end.

On the other side of the coin, I don’t have much reading time so the length actually worked for me. I was able to read a romantic story with sex in less than half an hour. If it had been a full-length, single-title story, I wouldn’t have been able to take the time to read it. And if I could just figure out how to load PDFs on my iPod, the short length would be perfect to read on that rather than the computer.

And I wonder how the story premise would have held up over 100,000 words. It was a great premise, one that had me thinking cool, but could it be stretched to support a novel? I don’t know. For that reason, maybe the short length was a good thing.

It also intrigued me–I’m infamous for writing 115,000 word books. I laugh when I see the contract clause about writing at least 90,000 words because the only way that’s going to be a problem is if they won’t let me go over that number. But reading this story made me wonder if I could write something that short and have it be as satisfying a read as this one was? Because even though I wanted more, the story was a satisfying read. I don’t know. Short is not my natural length. :-)

I’m interested enough to want to try. I won’t, of course. I have another story I need to be working on that has a deadline and I don’t have any characters I want to use up on something short when I could get a full book about them. But. But what if I did like a series of little vignettes about the same characters? Kind of a serial-type thing?

Argh! Back to the WIP, the one that’s due March 1st.

Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “Quickies”

  1. Arkansas Cyndi says:

    I like a quickie (or bite). Sometimes they are too short but then sometimes they are like a great appetizer…and I rush out and buy other books by that author! It’s a great way to “try out” a new author…see if you like the author’s voice, etc.

    I like to write shorts. Tryig to write 115k scares the cr*p out of me!

  2. Patti O'Shea says:

    Cyndi,

    115,000 scares the hell out of me, too. It helps me to think of it in smaller pieces, like 4 pages a day or a scene. And I always vow that the next book is coming in at 400 pages, not 460 and I never manage that.

    Re: the quickie/bite, it was a nice intro to the author and I’d buy more from her in the future.

    Patti

  3. Anthony James Barnett - author says:

    Liked the post. Thanks.

    I found it an interesting concept that may be worth investigating. Where did you find the publisher, Patti? Do they have a presence on the Web?

  4. Patti O'Shea says:

    Anthony,

    There are a number of places to buy these shorts. eHarlequin does the Bites, Ellora’s Cave does the Quickies, and I found some free shorts at http://www.allromanceebooks.com

    This is something I haven’t looked into very deeply because writing short would be a challenge for me, but I think those should give you a start.

    Patti


buy lasix online meloxicam generic buy xenical online after function improve lung sporanox using buy cipro online chloramphenicol in treatment of eye infections buy nolvadex online albendazole die off goat sheep buy clomid online crestor side effects neuropathy buy flagyl online flutamide affinity binding